On 07.04.2015, at 18:07, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:

> On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Tobias Pape wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 07.04.2015, at 17:24, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
>> 
>>> But at the same time we want to minimize the usage of the dictionary API of the Environments.
>> 
>> Do we?
> 
> I could only quote myself here, so someone else will have to answer this.
> 
>> 
>>> And Symbols are still Strings. :)
>> 
>> I disagree.
> 
> #aSymbol isKindOf: String. "==> true"
> 
> Should the code be portable to other Smalltalk dialects?
> Do we plan to change the superclass of Symbol?
> Is there any other reason to not use symbols as strings in Squeak?
> 

Just feel free to change TileMorphTest>>#expectedFailures and TileMorphTest>>#setUp to your liking.
We could also just remove it.

best
	-tobias

> 
> Levente
> 
>> 
>> Best
>> 	-Tobias
>> 
>>> 
>>> Levente
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Tobias Pape wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 07.04.2015, at 17:16, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> What's wrong with #hasClassNamed:?
>>>> 
>>>> From my POV, it takes a String, and we wanted a symbol here ;)
>>>> Also, I wanted t be conisten with #setUP
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Levente
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, commits at source.squeak.org wrote: