[squeak-dev] New Cog VMs available
Tobias Pape
Das.Linux at gmx.de
Mon Apr 13 11:35:17 UTC 2015
Hi,
On 13.04.2015, at 13:29, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10 April 2015 at 16:21, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Hi Eliot,
>>
>> On 10.04.2015, at 15:46, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10.04.2015, at 00:17, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Updated on the CI :)
>>>>
>>>> aaand reverted. We got a crash:
>>>> http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/1245/console
>>>
>>
>>
>>> Yes. I get a crash in updating with the v3 VM. So far no problems with the Spur VM. But Tibias, unless the bleeding edge gets tested how will I spit these regressions? I need to know. So can we not have two builds, one with the last known good and one with the bleeding edge?
>>
>> Sure, this is possible.
>> probably something like a matrix build.
>> Frank is more savvy with the infrastructure, tho.
>
> I'd say that SqueakTrunk should use the latest stable Cog - its main
> purpose is to test _trunk's_ bleeding edge. We do also have
> SqueakTrunkOnSpur, which should track Spur's/Cog's bleeding edge.
>
Ack :)
> Which means we should split the versions in the build scripts. Maybe
> we should just have a COG_VERSION and a SPUR_COG_VERSION as a
> not-too-stinky quick win?
Probably… I don't know yet. Have to make up my mind :)
>
> frank
>
>> best
>> -Tobias
>>
>>
>>> Otherwise I'm flying blind.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>> -Tobias
>>>>
>>>>> Best
>>>>> -Tobias
>>>>> On 09.04.2015, at 23:28, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|