I agree that it's yucky to wrap the buttons, bit it's at least equally
yucky to have them poking out the right side of the SystemWindow ;-)

Another idea is that since these are so called "optional buttons", all
their functionality can be selected from menus or by keyboard shortcuts, so
if the window is to small to fit them, they could be hidden.
That way the small window have more space to show code pane and the list
panes.

Karl

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 2:12 PM, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hm...
>> Then the buttons should wrap instead of poking out the side of the window.
>> The buttons work but the GUI look is not very nice.
>>
>> Karl
>>
>> Wrapping the button bar?  yuck.
> what about having the button bar factor into the minimum width of the
> containing tool?  Not allowing the tool to get small enough to force the
> write/overflow.
> This is probably relevant for height, too.
> -cbc
>
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Marcel Taeumel <
>> marcel.taeumel at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> wrote:
>>
>>> But clipping is not good because you hide buttons that cannot be clicked
>>> anymore. :-( There actually is a minimal window extent, which just has
>>> to be
>>> honored/computed. :)
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Marcel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-ToolBuilder-Morphic-mt-131-mcz-tp4819699p4820052.html
>>> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20150417/a59f9107/attachment.htm