How about scrolling the buttons?

Lou

On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:25:03 +0200, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com>
wrote:

>I agree that it's yucky to wrap the buttons, bit it's at least equally
>yucky to have them poking out the right side of the SystemWindow ;-)
>
>Another idea is that since these are so called "optional buttons", all
>their functionality can be selected from menus or by keyboard shortcuts, so
>if the window is to small to fit them, they could be hidden.
>That way the small window have more space to show code pane and the list
>panes.
>
>Karl
>
>On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb at gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 2:12 PM, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hm...
>>> Then the buttons should wrap instead of poking out the side of the window.
>>> The buttons work but the GUI look is not very nice.
>>>
>>> Karl
>>>
>>> Wrapping the button bar?  yuck.
>> what about having the button bar factor into the minimum width of the
>> containing tool?  Not allowing the tool to get small enough to force the
>> write/overflow.
>> This is probably relevant for height, too.
>> -cbc
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Marcel Taeumel <
>>> marcel.taeumel at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> But clipping is not good because you hide buttons that cannot be clicked
>>>> anymore. :-( There actually is a minimal window extent, which just has
>>>> to be
>>>> honored/computed. :)
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Marcel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-ToolBuilder-Morphic-mt-131-mcz-tp4819699p4820052.html
>>>> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
-----------------------------------------------------------
Louis LaBrunda
Keystone Software Corp.
SkypeMe callto://PhotonDemon
mailto:Lou at Keystone-Software.com http://www.Keystone-Software.com