I just realized that the squeak version uses ReferenceStream while the 
Pharo version uses Fuel, so the binary serializations are different and 
they won't speak to each other. Any chance that Fuel is ported to Squeak?

Regards,
Robert

On 12/04/2015 06:11 AM, Robert Withers wrote:
> I am unable to import these files into SqueakSource, so it may be best 
> done from inside Pharo with Monticello. Here are working Crypto and 
> SqueakElib in Pharo, prior to SecureSession refactoring and Reed 
> Solomon. I include the correct version of LayeredProtocol.
>
> Regards,
> Robert
>
>
> On 12/04/2015 05:47 AM, Robert Withers wrote:
>> Best Regards
>>
>> http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography.html
>> http://www.squeaksource.com/squeakelib.html
>>
>>
>> On 12/04/2015 05:44 AM, Robert Withers wrote:
>>> After my password reset on squeaksource, I committed to both 
>>> Cryptography and SqueakElib, project links below.
>>>
>>> In the case of Cryptography, I had a version ported to Pharo ... I 
>>> will organize Pharo ports of both after Reed Solomon is stable, and 
>>> announce them to the Pharo list. This way both environments can be 
>>> supported through this one repository.
>>>
>>> Robert
>>>
>>> On 12/04/2015 04:35 AM, Stephan Eggermont wrote:
>>>> On 03-12-15 23:06, Robert Withers wrote:
>>>>> Are any of these used by both squeak and Pharo? That would be the 
>>>>> right
>>>>> move I think. I will ask about getting my password reset for
>>>>> squeaksource, since that is where the old code resides.
>>>>
>>>> All of them. Mostly timing of project start/high activity and who are
>>>> maintaining it decided on platforms. There was a time when 
>>>> squeaksource was not so stable and then many projects migrated, and 
>>>> I currently hear least about stability issues from ss3, but the 
>>>> load on smalltalkhub is much higher, I assume, as that is used for 
>>>> the pharo ci.
>>>>
>>>> In the not so far future Pharo is likely to move to a git based 
>>>> infrastructure, using libgit2. Early adopters are already using it.
>>>> I haven't heard the squeak ideas about that.
>>>>
>>>> Stephan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20151204/3ceb48e3/attachment-0001.htm