On 12/07/2015 07:26 PM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr. wrote:
> Robert Withers wrote:
>> Ben, Huw, Todd and Sven, thank you all for your feedback!  I suppose I
>> could call the project "CryptOCaps" but for some reason I glommed onto
>> mushroom as the name. Not grandiose and it is somewhat descriptive...a
>> network of secure sessions, each one a mushroom. Ceps are highly valued.
>> We can tag it for the catalog.
> Though pretty old, the Mushroom Smalltalk computer was very well known
> at one time:
>
> http://www.wolczko.com/mushroom/
>
> Though one is a hardware project and yours is software, there is still
> the potential for some confusion.
>
> -- Jecel

Oh dear, that's a potential naming conflict. Perhaps this is where the 
idea came from, as I have read about this Mushroom Project long ago. As 
this hardware project is not longer active, repurposing the name may be 
reasonable but I cannot say wityhout that authority. There are 2 layers, 
session & presentation, so perhaps 2 names are needed and the one 
project needs splitting. And there is the consensus issue. Perhaps I 
should use technical names and be done with it: SecureSession & 
CryptOCaps. Well, I will leave off changing again until agreed to names 
are established, as I don't know what to do about it, but I welcome 
suggestions...

Maelstrom, Mushroom, Crystalline & Phosphor, SecureSession & CryptOCaps, 
pther suggestions?

Robert