Robert Withers wrote
> Perhaps I should use technical names and be done with it

Yes, please! I have used Squeak and Pharo almost every day for 6 years,
closely following the mailing lists, and still find the buffet of clever
project names baffling. Unless we're not trying to take over the world with
a particular project (like maybe Seaside, which could've blown Rails out of
the water given a little luck), I don't see what we gain in trade giving up
clarity.



-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/evolutions-of-squeakelib-crypto-Reed-Solomon-tp4864527p4867855.html
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.