[squeak-dev] Re: [Vm-dev] So who broke bitOr: ?
bert at freudenbergs.de
Wed Feb 18 22:47:36 UTC 2015
> On 18.02.2015, at 12:21, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:
> On 18-02-2015, at 12:15 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>> On 18.02.2015, at 12:06, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:
>>> On a fresh Pi vm (as in svn updated yesterday)
>>> 16rFFFF bitOr:(16rFFFF bitShift: 16) -> -1
>>> On a slightly older Mac vm
>>> 16rFFFF bitOr:(16rFFFF bitShift: 16) -> 4294967295, aka 16rFFFFFFFF
>> Uggh. Disgusting.
> Exactly. And I should probably add that a few-week-old Pi vm got it right, so it’s a recent change.
>> What exactly is a "fresh Pi VM”?
> Uh, a freshly built vm for a Raspberry Pi? As in the things that have not only now sold 5m, but about 500,00 in the last 3 weeks, almost all Pi 2 … they’re taking over the planet I tell you!
I meant that quite literally. As in, what's the output of "Smalltalk vmVersion"?
- Bert -
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4115 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20150218/d9962d10/smime.bin
More information about the Squeak-dev