Eliot Miranda-2 wrote
> Ugh.  I was blindsided.  I saw the numbers as times not rates.  Marcel,
> I'm sorry.  OK indeed the difference would be the cost of the bounds check
> in each array access.  Interesting to see at what point the poorer memory
> locality of the list makes it worse.  Difficult to measure given the
> locality is decided by history and the GC.

With Spur could you use object pinning to make a dense linked list? And then
use that for arrays that need to be fast? 



--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-Collections-mt-593-mcz-tp4799750p4800035.html
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.