On 20.01.2015, at 01:30, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> On 20.01.2015, at 01:04, Chris Muller <ma.chris.m at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > - Backport all the fixes we need (this + the rename fix + ??)
> > - Update the All-In-One.
> > - Someone must sign All-In-One.
> > - Test signed All-In-One (windows, Linux, Mac).
> > - Upload All-In-One.
> > - Upload plain image + changes.
> >
> 
> I understand.
> I just asked for an image where someone has hit the update button.
> But yes, somewhen™ we definitely should do these things :)
> 
> ANy old 4.5 image or the release one?

I don't understand the question.
I would take the current release image on the file server and
update it, and put it back with a new number.
  For the all-in-one, similar process.
(But I would remove the update number from the image inside the
all-in-one )

Best
	-Tobias

>  
> 
> Bets
>         -Tobias
> 
> 
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 19.01.2015, at 23:54, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I deleted my package-cache and now I see it.
> >>>
> >>> It looks like this check was since moved higher where it would not get triggered unnecessarily.  So its fixed in trunk.  Unfortunate ofr the old version to be in 4.5 along with other issues too.  Hopefully we'll find energy to make another 4.5 at least we know 4.6 won't have it.
> >>
> >> What's necessary besides
> >>        -update
> >>        -cleanup (if even necessary)
> >>        -upload?
> >>
> >> Best
> >>        -Tobias