#steps: reminds me of mophic - step interval, right?

#withNext: reminds me of #withIndexDo:.  I'd expect it to provide two
arguments to the block (until I learned otherwise).

#next: is stream, and definitely not what we want.

I like Eliot's questioning of adding a new method at all, although I'm
guilty of doing that a lot.

What about a new constructor on Interval?

Interval startAt: x next: z
Interval startAt: x next: z by: b
?

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>
wrote:

> On 07.07.2015, at 06:09, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > I've got a small naming puzzle:
> >
> > So we have
> >       x to: y
> > that makes
> >       Intervall (x, x+1, x+2, ... , y)
> >
> > And we can do
> >       x to: x + z
> > to get
> >       Intervall (x, x+1, x+2, ..., x+z)
> >
> >
> > But we have x twice in there.
> >
> > What would you name the message
> >       x ???? z
> > that gives
> >       Intervall (x, x+1, x+2, ..., x+z)
> >
> > I'm curious for your answers :)
> >
> > Best regards
> >       -Tobias
>
>
> x steps: z
> x steps: z by: b
>
> x withNext: z
> x withNext: z by: b
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20150707/42b1944c/attachment.htm