[squeak-dev] final Squeak-4.6-All-in-One posted

Tobias Pape Das.Linux at gmx.de
Sun Jul 19 16:48:28 UTC 2015


On 19.07.2015, at 18:34, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Fabio, say, which platform did you test on?  Hm, something
> interesting -- that new SqueakSSL (for Linux) is 7 MB where the one I
> have been using is only 27K, which easily makes it the largest plugin
> and would slightly inflate teh size of the All-In-One.
> 
> Why is it so much bigger, is it compiled with debug information or something?

No, I statically linked against LibreSSL.

Best regards
	-Tobias

> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Fabio Niephaus <lists at fniephaus.com> wrote:
>> + 1 for releasing 4.6 and handling problems as users find them :)
>> 
>> But there's one problem that I just found: try and run the following and you
>> should get a SqueakSSL error (-5):
>> 
>> (WebClient new httpGet:
>> 'https://api.travis-ci.org/repos/squeak-smalltalk/squeak.org/builds')
>> content
>> 
>> Looks like we forgot to update the SqueakSSL plugins with the ones from [1]?
>> After doing that manually, the above works just fine...
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Fabio
>> 
>> [1] https://github.com/itsmeront/squeakssl/releases
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:06 PM Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Chris Muller <ma.chris.m at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> There was 1 vote for including the legacy Mac plugins and 0 against.
>>>> So Craig and I made one last All-in-One and its uploaded.
>>>> 
>>>> So, I think can we call 4.6 "done" then?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Do we have any volunteers to do some shake down tests?  dare we do some
>>> shake down tests?  SHould we instead release and handle problems as users
>>> find them?  Chris, have you run your test suite using the 4.6 yet?
>>> 
>>> --
>>> _,,,^..^,,,_
>>> best, Eliot




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list