[squeak-dev] Re: Is this a bug with Step "Over"?
btc at openinworld.com
Wed Jun 24 11:09:07 UTC 2015
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> On 23.06.2015, at 23:23, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Why not vice versa? Halt being a Warning would be more natural to me than Warning being
>>> a Halt.
>> We really should structure the class hierarchy based on the exception
>> handling use-cases we want to support, not semantics. If Halt
>> inherited from Warning, then applications would no longer be able to
>> halt separately from handling Warnings (except by handling Halt too,
>> no way!).
> Then they should be siblings in any case.
Should these have a new superclass whose name echos their common
handling wrt to the debugger?
(not that I'm clear on what that name would be)
More information about the Squeak-dev