No, because as the comment says, I want to be able to implement my own
Exception>>#printDetailsOn: without overriding a base package.

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:15 AM, marcel.taeumel <Marcel.Taeumel at hpi.de> wrote:
> While you're at it: Could you add an empty #printDetailsOn: and remove this
> #respondsTo: call? :)
>
> Best,
> Marcel
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-Kernel-cmm-925-mcz-tp4828975p4829037.html
> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>