Hi Eliot,

I'm not sure how it's configured, but do we have a VM category, and the
issues are getting automatically assigned to me. The Mantis tracker is
quite helpful for VM issues that cannot be immediately resolved on the
mailing lists.

Dave

> Hi Frank,
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various
>> subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a
>> subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to
>> someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the ticket.)
>>
>> Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of
>> receiving the occasional mail on these topics.
>>
>> Here are our current mappings:
>> Any: KenCausey
>> Box-Admins: KenCausey
>> CI: FrankShearar
>> Documentation: casey
>> Games: asm
>> IRC: frankcag
>> Monticello: avi
>> News: gcorriga
>> Release Packaging: FrankShearar
>> SqueakMap: gokr
>> ToDo: RalphJohnson
>> Traits: dvf
>> www.squeak.org: KarlRamberg
>>
>
> I hope we could add VM and I could be an owner or Dave could be.
>
>
>>
>> I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use
>> bugs.squeak.org very much (sadly).
>>
>> I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone else
>> would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects that
>> really ought to change owner.
>>
>> Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the bugs!
>> It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will
>> definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox.
>>
>> The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because almost
>> no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :)
>>
>> frank
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> _,,,^..^,,,_
> best, Eliot
>
>