Hi Nicolai,

> On Sep 12, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess at web.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 2015-09-11 11:06 GMT+02:00 Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>:
>> On 11 September 2015 at 09:38, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess at web.de> wrote:
>> > anyone maintaining the bugtracker entries?
>> > I would like to close some issues (reported by me).
>> 
>> Feel free to do so!
>> 
>> > btw should I continue reporting bugs to the bugtracker, or should
>> > I use the ML only?
>> 
>> Please do continue to report issues to the bugtracker.
> 
> Ok, but maybe I will send the reports to the ML as well. The last time
> I reported some issues on the bugtracker for the upcoming releases,
> they didn't not get much attentions.
> There were some issues reported for the 4.3 and 4.4 release and they are outdated now,
> as I am an "updater" now, I can close those myself, but two issues are reported
> for project "squeak website", can someone else close this issues please.
> 
> Some time after the 4.4 (or 4.5?) release, I asked several times on the ML for
> the release plan for the VM, because I had some serious problems with getting
> FFI to work with the included VM (it was quite old), but I got no responds.

I don't remember any traffic on vm-dev asking for this.

> And as the prerelease for 4.6 was announced, I asked if it has a squeak vm release candidate  too,
> but again, I got no response. 
> Is the Squeak release always only about the image? 

On the contrary.  This release, we released the Spur VM (squeak v5) which has a brand new object representation never before used in any system, and providing much better performance.  The VM also includes SSL plugins compiled by Tobias Pape that are statically-linked against their cryptographic libraries.


>> frank
>> 
>> > nicolai

Sent from my iPhone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20150913/76e1e281/attachment.htm