[squeak-dev] Re: Discard the event tickler process?
marcel.taeumel
Marcel.Taeumel at hpi.de
Mon Apr 4 14:34:50 UTC 2016
Hi, again.
Okay. Actually, you do need the event tickler for CMD+. if no other process
fetches events. Seems to be some VM-specific behavior you cannot trace at
Smalltalk level.
The CMD+. will not be recognized by the VM if there was no recent
EventSensor >> #fetchMoreEvents. Seems to be a side-effect.
So, no. We cannot get rid of the event tickler. However, why is there an
InterruptSemaphore if the event tickler could easily check for CMD+. itself?
Why involve the VM at all?
Best,
Marcel
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Discard-the-event-tickler-process-tp4888251p4888267.html
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|