[squeak-dev] Re: The Trunk: KernelTests-pre.310.mcz

Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda at gmail.com
Wed Aug 17 02:14:33 UTC 2016



> On Aug 16, 2016, at 2:25 PM, Fabio Niephaus <lists at fniephaus.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:16 PM Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
>> BTW, VM produced by appveyor automaton doesn't suffer from the problem, at least since we refactored the makefile and removed explicit msvcrt library linking.
>> So whether compiled with gcc or clang, the win32 failure will disappear as soon as we declare a newer vm as stable.
> 
> Does this mean we can/should use a recent win32 built by AppVeyor for the upcoming Squeak release?

Not until it proves to be stable.  Clément and I suspect the recent revision of the leafless setter optimisation in the Cogit.  Until we crack this I recommend using older VMs.
>  
>> 
>> 2016-08-16 18:43 GMT+02:00 marcel.taeumel <Marcel.Taeumel at hpi.de>:
>>> Eliot Miranda-2 wrote
>>> > So shouldn't the code test for being on the Windows platform and not
>>> > answer
>>> > it as an expected failure on linux and Mac OS X?
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Nicolas Cellier <
>>> 
>>> > nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@
>>> 
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> It only fails for windows VM if using msvcrt.dll
>>> >> because Microsoft math library is bugged...
>>> >>
>>> >> 2016-08-16 1:07 GMT+02:00 Levente Uzonyi &lt;
>>> 
>>> > leves at .elte
>>> 
>>> > &gt;:
>>> >>
>>> >>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2016,
>>> 
>>> > commits at .squeak
>>> 
>>> >  wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Patrick Rein uploaded a new version of KernelTests to project The Trunk:
>>> >>>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/KernelTests-pre.310.mcz
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Name: KernelTests-pre.310
>>> >>>> Author: pre
>>> >>>> Time: 15 August 2016, 11:25:58.171656 pm
>>> >>>> UUID: 38fde71e-1444-6b4f-9d3b-24221c24a5d2
>>> >>>> Ancestors: KernelTests-ul.309
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Recorded the wrong float underflow as an expected failure as it is
>>> >>>> going
>>> >>>> to be the expected behavior (somewhat) in the upcoming release
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I've never seen that test failing. Is it a windows specific failure?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Levente
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> =============== Diff against KernelTests-ul.309 ===============
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Item was added:
>>> >>>> + ----- Method: FloatTest>>expectedFailures (in category
>>> >>>> 'characterization') -----
>>> >>>> + expectedFailures
>>> >>>> +
>>> >>>> +       ^ #(testTimesTwoPowerGradualUnderflow) !
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > _,,,^..^,,,_
>>> > best, Eliot
>>> 
>>> Hi Eliot,
>>> 
>>> yes, I already did that.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Marcel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-KernelTests-pre-310-mcz-tp4911102p4911371.html
>>> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20160816/b5cb0906/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list