On 16.02.2016, at 19:56, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:

> ToolBuilder-SUnit AND ToolBuilder-Tests?  Yikes, I just looked and it
> appears we only have one version of ToolBuilder-Tests and it was
> committed by... me??  I don't know why I would have done that.
> Perhaps it should be merged into ToolBuilder-SUnit.
> 

Why? ToolBuilder-Tests are tests _for_ ToolBuilder.
ToolBuilder-SUnit is the SUnitToolBuilder, completely different...


> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 6:32 AM, marcel.taeumel <Marcel.Taeumel at hpi.de> wrote:
>> Hi, there.
>> 
>> I know this discussion is about 3 years old. I just stumbled upon this
>> dependency discussion.
>> 
>> But what about
>> 
>> "ToolBuilder-Morphic" -> "Morphic-ToolBuilder" or "MorphicToolBuilder"
>> "ToolBuilder-MVC" -> "ST80-ToolBuilder" or "ST80ToolBuilder"
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> Right now we have 4 tool builder packages in trunk: "ToolBuilder-Kernel",
>> "ToolBuilder-MVC", "ToolBuilder-SUnit", "ToolBuilder-Tests". Then, it is
>> always kind of dangerous to have packages with a dash inside. Mixes up with
>> system categories too easily. And the "prefix package" (i.e. "ToolBuilder")
>> would commit everything again. We need to be careful.
>> 
>> Better examples include: "CollectionsTests", "MorphicExtras",
>> "VersionNumberTests", "KernelTests".
>> 
>> Best,
>> Marcel
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Breaking-up-ToolBuilder-tp4689489p4877865.html
>> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> 
>