> Yes. I mean that everything that was in 'Kernel-Chronology' will now
> be in 'Chronology' or 'Chronology-Core'.

So we will not be able to make a kernel image that does not include
some flavor of Chronology then...

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:59 PM, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:54:44AM -0600, Chris Muller wrote:
>> I have no problem if you want move Chronology classes to their own
>> package (but please do use the "-Core" and "-Tests" suffixes so we
>> don't suffer the prefix selection problem).
>>
>
> So it should be this:
>
>   Chronology-Core
>   Chronology-Tests
>
> Instead of this:
>
>   Chronology
>   ChronologyTests
>
> Is that right?
>
>> I'll be curious whether
>> you choose to move Date and Time too..
>
> Yes. I mean that everything that was in 'Kernel-Chronology' will now
> be in 'Chronology' or 'Chronology-Core'.
>
> Dave
>
>