On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 02:38:43PM -0800, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 21.02.2016, at 10:36, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 7:35 PM, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:54:44AM -0600, Chris Muller wrote:
> >>> I have no problem if you want move Chronology classes to their own
> >>> package (but please do use the "-Core" and "-Tests" suffixes so we
> >>> don't suffer the prefix selection problem).  I'll be curious whether
> >>> you choose to move Date and Time too..
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> I need some guidance on package naming.
> >> 
> >> We have packages named 'Kernel' and  'KernelTests', 'Morphic' and
> >> 'MorphicTests', and 'Collections' and 'CollectionsTests'. Based on
> >> this, I would expect that 'Chronology' and 'ChronologyTests' would
> >> be good package names.
> >> 
> >> Is that right? Or should it instead be 'Chronology-Core' and
> >> 'Chronology-Tests'?
> > 
> > Note we also have packages named Regex-Core, Regex-Tests,
> > SqueakSSL-Core, SqueakSSL-Tests, WebClient-Core, WebClient-Tests,
> > which were (formerly) external packages.  You want to make Chronology
> > more like an external package, so it can be swapped out more easily.
> > 
> > "-Core" brings a clarity to the core unit's modular boundary, while
> > being consistent with the number of levels in each package name that
> > comprises that system.
> 
> Agree with Chris.
> 
> - Bert -
> 

I am not seeing the update notices on the mailing list, but I just did
the move of Kernel-Chronology to Chronology-Core and KernelTests-Chronology
to Chronology-Tests, with update-dtl.349.mcm to add the new packages. All
seems well and I can update an earlier image from the stream.

Dave