[squeak-dev] Monticello merge - what does Keep/Reject mean again?
Herbert König
herbertkoenig at gmx.net
Sat Jan 23 17:45:36 UTC 2016
Hi,
to me Fabios suggestion makes clear what the buttons do (I took a note
because I never knew).
Clearer than the other suggestions. I like it _very_ clear.
Cheers,
Herbert
Am 23.01.2016 um 17:37 schrieb Eliot Miranda:
> Hi Fabio, Chris,
>
> On Jan 22, 2016, at 4:00 PM, Fabio Niephaus <lists at fniephaus.com
> <mailto:lists at fniephaus.com>> wrote:
>
>> I think that it's not only the naming but also the direction that is
>> confusing. Sorry for being selfish, but I usually care about my own stuff
>> more than about the stuff on the server, right?
>>
>> How about:
>>
>> Keep -> 'Replace Local'
>> Reject -> 'Keep Local'
>
> Let's try and search for more candidates. The two word ones are
> clunky and long. Keep is horrible because it conflicts with the sense
> of "keep what's mine". But some other duals are (where left is
> Replace Local and right is Keep Local)
>
> Import vs Exclude
> Accept vs Reject
> Merge vs Ignore
> Advance vs Remain
> Approve vs Disapprove
>
> More of a stretch but may trigger thought:
> Infect vs Quarantine
> Ingest vs Refuse
>
> and the question mark at the end of each suggestion is implicit ;-)
>
> Any other suggestions?
>
>> This is also what most syncing services name the two options when you
>> start using them (e.g. iCloud or Google Chrome Sync).
>>
>> Best,
>> Fabio
>>
>> --
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:41 PM Chris Cunningham
>> <cunningham.cb at gmail.com <mailto:cunningham.cb at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> So, once again, I am bitten by these button labels. They just
>> don't speak to me.
>>
>> From back in 2013, there was a description by Nice that explained
>> it thus:
>> "If you say keep, then you accept the incoming version to replace
>> your version.
>> If you say reject, then refuse the incoming version and prefer to
>> keep your own version."
>>
>> Then back in 2015, another discussion about what these values
>> mean with several options thrown out. But it looks like we still
>> have Keep and Reject - which still confuses me.
>>
>> Maybe we could just relabel them the way Nice suggested:
>> Keep -> 'Keep Incoming'
>> Reject -> 'Reject Incoming'
>> ? Maybe also update the balloon help to take Nice's exact words?
>>
>> I'll push a change later tonight/tomorrow to the InBox unless I
>> hear back that this is a horrible idea.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> cbc
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20160123/f96ac773/attachment.htm
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|