[squeak-dev] Monticello merge - what does Keep/Reject mean again?

Herbert König herbertkoenig at gmx.net
Sat Jan 23 17:45:36 UTC 2016


Hi,

to me Fabios suggestion makes clear what the buttons do (I took a note 
because I never knew).
Clearer than the other suggestions. I like it _very_ clear.

Cheers,

Herbert

Am 23.01.2016 um 17:37 schrieb Eliot Miranda:
> Hi Fabio, Chris,
>
> On Jan 22, 2016, at 4:00 PM, Fabio Niephaus <lists at fniephaus.com 
> <mailto:lists at fniephaus.com>> wrote:
>
>> I think that it's not only the naming but also the direction that is
>> confusing. Sorry for being selfish, but I usually care about my own stuff
>> more than about the stuff on the server, right?
>>
>> How about:
>>
>>   Keep -> 'Replace Local'
>>   Reject -> 'Keep Local'
>
> Let's try and search for more candidates.  The two word ones are 
> clunky and long.  Keep is horrible because it conflicts with the sense 
> of "keep what's mine".  But some other duals are (where left is 
> Replace Local and right is Keep Local)
>
> Import vs Exclude
> Accept vs Reject
> Merge vs Ignore
> Advance vs Remain
> Approve vs Disapprove
>
> More of a stretch but may trigger thought:
> Infect vs Quarantine
> Ingest vs Refuse
>
> and the question mark at the end of each suggestion is implicit ;-)
>
> Any other suggestions?
>
>> This is also what most syncing services name the two options when you
>> start using them (e.g. iCloud or Google Chrome Sync).
>>
>> Best,
>> Fabio
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:41 PM Chris Cunningham 
>> <cunningham.cb at gmail.com <mailto:cunningham.cb at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     So, once again, I am bitten by these button labels.  They just
>>     don't speak to me.
>>
>>     From back in 2013, there was a description by Nice that explained
>>     it thus:
>>     "If you say keep, then you accept the incoming version to replace
>>     your version.
>>     If you say reject, then refuse the incoming version and prefer to
>>     keep your own version."
>>
>>     Then back in 2015, another discussion about what these values
>>     mean with several options thrown out.  But it looks like we still
>>     have Keep and Reject - which still confuses me.
>>
>>     Maybe we could just relabel them the way Nice suggested:
>>         Keep -> 'Keep Incoming'
>>         Reject -> 'Reject Incoming'
>>     ?  Maybe also update the balloon help to take Nice's exact words?
>>
>>     I'll push a change later tonight/tomorrow to the InBox unless I
>>     hear back that this is a horrible idea.
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     cbc
>>
>>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20160123/f96ac773/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list