[squeak-dev] spyOnWorldFor:

Tobias Pape Das.Linux at gmx.de
Sun Jul 10 19:53:56 UTC 2016


On 10.07.2016, at 21:51, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've committed a non urgent change just to check:
> There's now a single failure instead of 3 with a raw log:
> No output has been received in the last 10m0s, this potentially indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself.
> https://travis-ci.org/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/jobs/143745141
> So IMO, it's green.

I've restarted that job, let's seem, maybe it was just a spurious thing.

Best regards

> 2016-07-10 17:07 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com>:
> Hi Eliot,
> The last build #158 at https://travis-ci.org/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/builds is red.
> But I suspect false positive.
> The details are at https://travis-ci.org/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/builds/143459279
> where only 3 build failed on macosx64 for newspeak and pharo, but succeeded on linux64 and squeak...
> Either the build should also fail for squeak if it's OS dependent.
> Or it should also fail for linux64 if it Smalltalk target dependent.
> But this combination is weird.
> Clicking on any of the failure won't give any information (empty raw log, ellapsed time not indicated...) while it works for succeeded builds... 
> 2016-07-10 16:45 GMT+02:00 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>:
> Hi Yoshiki,
>     try an up-to-date VM.  I'd point you to Travis could but I don't see entirely green builds there right now.  So pick up the most up-to-date VM from my site.
> _,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
> > On Jul 8, 2016, at 3:58 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima <Yoshiki.Ohshima at acm.org> wrote:
> >
> > I am trying a few things on Squeak 5.0.  In earlier versions there was
> > AndreasSystemProfier (formerly known as QSystemProfier) and had a
> > method called spyOnWorldFor:, which was quite useful.  I just loaded
> > AndreasProfier-eem.11.mcz and tried it but it crashed the 5.0 all in
> > one VM on Mac OS 10.10.
> >
> > Is this a known issue?  Is there an alternative to it?
> >

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list