[squeak-dev] Re: Renaming Squeak's system version from 'Squeak*alpha' to 'SqueakTrunk'

Ben Coman btc at openinworld.com
Mon Jun 27 17:25:51 UTC 2016


Release To Manfacture

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:05 AM, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 Makes sense.
>>
>> BTW, what does Rtm stand for?
>
>
> I'd like to know this too.  No one seems to have answered this yet.  What
> does "Rtm" mean?  I know what RTFM means.  Doesn't seem to fit here ;-)
>
>>
>> And how will minor maintenance releases be marked, which happen from
>> time to time?
>>
>> As Tobias writes
>>
>>     SystemVersion current
>>
>>
>> does not return an 'alpha' suffix, this should be fixed.
>>
>>
>> --Hannes
>>
>> On 6/22/16, marcel.taeumel <Marcel.Taeumel at hpi.de> wrote:
>> > Tobias Pape wrote
>> >> On 22.06.2016, at 11:24, marcel.taeumel &lt;
>> >
>> >> Marcel.Taeumel@
>> >
>> >> &gt; wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi there,
>> >>>
>> >>> we have a system version: "SystemVersion current". For trunk images,
>> >>> it
>> >>> used
>> >>> to say 'Squeak4.1alpha' or something like it. Right now, it doesn't
>> >>> even
>> >>> add
>> >>> the 'alpha' suffix.
>> >>>
>> >>> Can we change that to 'SqueakTrunk'? What would break? Right now,
>> >>> SystemVersion works with a string rather than major/minor numbers. I
>> >>> assume
>> >>> that there is some code that parses that string. Metacello does that,
>> >>> for
>> >>> example.
>> >>> Any thoughts?
>> >>
>> >> Yes.
>> >>
>> >> SystemVersion current  should give the following
>> >>
>> >> for 4.6              Squeak4.6
>> >> for 5.0              Squeak5.0
>> >> for trunk    Squeak5.1alpha  (or Squeak5.1trunk if it must be, but
>> >> please
>> >> Squeak{stable+1}{dev-indicator})
>> >>
>> >> Best
>> >>      -Tobias
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Best,
>> >>> Marcel
>> >
>> > Okay, we good improve the version number in trunk images and treat them
>> > as
>> > (Git) tags.
>> >
>> > ...
>> > Squeak5.1alpha
>> > Squeak5.1beta
>> > Squeak5.1rc1
>> > Squeak5.1rc2
>> > Squeak5.1rtm
>> > Squeak5.2alpha
>> > Squeak6.0alpha
>> > Squeak6.0beta
>> > ...
>> >
>> > Even if we decide to not make a minor release but a major the tag can
>> > jump.
>> > So, any suffix after the version number indicates the trunk stream.
>> >
>> > Alpha = Open to any code submittions
>> > Beta = Feature freeze, bug fixes only
>> > Rc1...n = Some bugs fixed, next try
>> > Rtm = Full code freeze, will be the one to release
>> >
>> > Would this work?
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Marcel
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>> >
>> > http://forum.world.st/Renaming-Squeak-s-system-version-from-Squeak-alpha-to-SqueakTrunk-tp4902398p4902424.html
>> > Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> _,,,^..^,,,_
> best, Eliot
>
>
>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list