Hi,

On 04.11.2016, at 18:48, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm getting timeouts every time I try and refresh source.squeak.org.
> 
> McStalker.oscogvm$ ping -c 4 source.squeak.org
> PING source.squeak.org (104.239.229.92): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 104.239.229.92: icmp_seq=0 ttl=45 time=96.017 ms
> 64 bytes from 104.239.229.92: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=96.136 ms
> 64 bytes from 104.239.229.92: icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=96.164 ms
> 64 bytes from 104.239.229.92: icmp_seq=3 ttl=45 time=96.851 ms
> 
> What box/ISP is this running on?  How can wee improve performance?  It's very bad right now.
> 

This Indexing-process of Chris' is still running and taking a huge damper on the performance
on andreas.box.squeak.org.
I also get timeouts a lot.

That being said, 104.239.229.92 is the front-end server:

% host source.squeak.org
source.squeak.org has address 104.239.229.92
source.squeak.org mail is handled by 0 mail.squeak.org.
% host squeak.org       
squeak.org has address 104.239.229.92
squeak.org mail is handled by 0 mail.squeak.org.

And ping (being ICMP) does no longer tell a lot about the throughput/latency of the web component.

As per Chris' statements, performance will improve in short time…


Best regards
	-Tobias


> _,,,^..^,,,_
> best, Eliot
>