On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 01:11:46AM +0100, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2016, Chris Muller wrote:
> 
> >I don't agree that the Squeak epoch was "supposed" to have been
> >defined relative to UTC.  Its just a number, it don't see that it
> 
> Do you mean that it shouldn't have any time zone defined?
> If yes, then it is so ambiguous that we should look for another epoch.
> 
> (The current ambiguity makes me implement new time classes whenever it's 
> relevant.)

Which reminds me ... I would still welcome feedback on www.squeaksource.com/UTCDateAndTime,
which can be loaded into a 64-bit trunk Spur image like this:

  (Installer ss project: 'UTCDateAndTime') install: 'Chronology-Core-dtl.3.mcz'. "load starting mcz"
  (MCMcmUpdater updateMapNamed: 'update' repository: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/UTCDateAndTime') doUpdate: false.

Dave