On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:

> There it is :D
>
> But any reason why not ifNil:ifNotNil: in ifAbsentAdd: ?
>

No good reason :-).  I won't tell you the reason I wrote it as I did ;-)
 Feel free to change it if you feel like it.


> Best regards
>         -Tobias
> > On 23.06.2017, at 21:06, commits at source.squeak.org wrote:
> >
> > Eliot Miranda uploaded a new version of Collections to project The Trunk:
> > http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Collections-eem.758.mcz
> >
> > ==================== Summary ====================
> >
> > Name: Collections-eem.758
> > Author: eem
> > Time: 23 June 2017, 12:06:10.238234 pm
> > UUID: 19a4f20b-1ac9-4bed-9262-1cab35e89afd
> > Ancestors: Collections-eem.757
> >
> > Deprecate addNewElement:
> >
> > =============== Diff against Collections-eem.757 ===============
> >
> > Item was removed:
> > - ----- Method: Set>>addNewElement: (in category 'adding') -----
> > - addNewElement: anObject
> > -     "Ensure anObject is part of the receiver.  Answer whether its
> membership was newly acquired."
> > -     | index |
> > -     index := self scanFor: anObject.
> > -     ^ (array at: index)
> > -             ifNil:
> > -                     [ self
> > -                             atNewIndex: index
> > -                             put: anObject asSetElement.
> > -                     true ]
> > -             ifNotNil: [ false ]!
> >
> >
>
>
>


-- 
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20170623/af2a331a/attachment.html>