> On 25.06.2017, at 20:33, Simon Michael <simon at joyful.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Bruce, thanks for working on it.
> 
> I see you've moved planet*.squeak.org to another server and are making updates. Great!
> 
> 
> On 6/25/17 7:54 AM, Bruce O'Neel wrote:
>> This now seems to work though there are a few points:
>>   * [http://pharo.org/news/atom.xml](http://pharo.org/news/atom.xml) gives me a 502, but, [http://pharo.org/news/](http://pharo.org/news/atom.xml) works fine.  Could someone look into this please?
> 
> That's a little confusing. Are you moving/mirroring planet squeak to the pharo.org namespace ?
> 
>> * I have renamed any site that still responds but has not been updated in 2017 to Historical - site name.  There are sadly only 6 sites NOT marked historical and 16 marked historical.  Surely there are some other squeak/pharo/?? blogs, right?  If so, please send them to me!
>>   * In a few weeks most of the historical sites will disapear.Â
> 
> Sounds good, I guess.
> 
>> * I've not looked hard at any other than planet.squeak.org.Â
>>   * Planetfr.squeak.org had no sites.  Should we keep it?
> Nope,
>> * As sad as I might be about it, croquet seems to have passed on.  Should I just get rid of planetcroquet?
> 
> Yep.
> 
> How about putting planetes on leave as well. It doesn't make sense to have an aggregator for one active feed.
> 
> Any of these could be revived later if necessary. Or the active feeds could be merged into the main planet, unless the mixed languages make that too noisy.
> 
> planetmisc.squeak.org - I've never heard of anyone using this, your call..
> 
> planet.smalltalk.org - hmm, still going strong. Do you think it still makes sense to have squeak-ish planet(s) separate from planet smalltalk ? Would it be better to focus everything there instead ?

Note that this particular planet is not currently on the new squeak infrastructure.

best regards
	-tobias


> 
> Best
> -Simon
> 
> 
>