Well, it is not too hard to come up with something, right. ;) Especially coding it is much easier than designing it (wrt. configuration and extensibility). You suggestion is, in my opinion, not better than keyboard-filtering of (hierarchical/grouped) menus. Hmm... user-friendly configuration would be more like expressing what you do frequently instead of filling a blacklist with things to not use.

It might be constructive to look for a good implementation of adaptive menus, whose design we could employ in Squeak. MS Office got rid of their approach, which I think is good. :)

Best,
Marcel
Am 03.11.2017 10:50:16 schrieb Bob Arning <arning315 at comcast.net>:
well, that's not too hard, either ;-)


On 11/3/17 4:41 AM, Marcel Taeumel wrote:

I suppose it would be more user-friendly to think about convenient means of menu configuration instead of just straying from one set of hard-coded values to another. :-/

Best,
Marcel


Am 02.11.2017 23:00:03 schrieb Bob Arning <arning315 at comcast.net> [mailto:arning315 at comcast.net]:
that's not too hard


On 11/2/17 3:48 PM, Chris Muller wrote:

It'd be neat if the IDE could somehow keep a collection of items to omit from the menu; with option to "restore all".



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20171103/8fdc1729/attachment.html>