> On 27.11.2017, at 09:08, Marcel Taeumel <marcel.taeumel at hpi.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi Chris,
> 
> sounds good. :) Add #row:column:ifAbsent: and deprecate #at:at:#ifInvalid:. I prefer "column" over "col".
> 

Can we (also) have #at:at:ifAbsent: ? I think this would be nice…

Best regards
	-Tobias

> Best,
> Marcel
>> Am 26.11.2017 23:29:17 schrieb Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb at gmail.com>:
>> 
>> I expected the argument to the last par to the method to expect a block, but it expects an value (returned directly to the caller).  I would have expected it to behave like at:ifAbsent: instead (which expects the block and evaluates it and returns it if not found).
>> 
>> Guess i'll add a different set of behaviors instead: #row:col:ifAbsent: which expects a block, say.
>> 
>> Any other ideas?
>> 
>> As another question, should the comment for Matrix be updated to not be a complete comparison between Matrix and Array2D, which is no longer in the image?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> cbc
>