On 15 October 2017 at 16:04, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:

> With respect to our immediate concern of moving the squeak.org services
> to a different provider, your point above captures what we need to know:
> The geographical location of the servers does not matter, and it is OK
> to use a provider based in Europe.
>
> This.  Great, we can move on!  There's a separate issue of GDPR
compliance, but that's a separate issue.

Now... next mad question.  Do we want to maximise ease of maintenance,
minimise cost, or some combination of the two?  For example, I have an
existing virtual host that's already running a Swiki for other purposes,
and I'd be happy to host the Squeak Swiki free, gratis, and for nothing -
and potentially other low-traffic services.  But that moves the Swiki away
from central management, and potentially complicates the data protection
situation.  To what extent do we want that?

Cheers,

- Peter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20171016/dd6d7ae8/attachment.html>