Something similar to what Peter says about the Wiki applies for
running a Mantis instance. Services running Mantis are available. Just
the data needs to be loaded. Mantis is not used much, but it should be
kept for archival and reference purposes.

--Hannes

On 10/16/17, Peter Crowther <peter at ozzard.org> wrote:
> On 15 October 2017 at 16:04, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
>
>> With respect to our immediate concern of moving the squeak.org services
>> to a different provider, your point above captures what we need to know:
>> The geographical location of the servers does not matter, and it is OK
>> to use a provider based in Europe.
>>
>> This.  Great, we can move on!  There's a separate issue of GDPR
> compliance, but that's a separate issue.
>
> Now... next mad question.  Do we want to maximise ease of maintenance,
> minimise cost, or some combination of the two?  For example, I have an
> existing virtual host that's already running a Swiki for other purposes,
> and I'd be happy to host the Squeak Swiki free, gratis, and for nothing -
> and potentially other low-traffic services.  But that moves the Swiki away
> from central management, and potentially complicates the data protection
> situation.  To what extent do we want that?
>
> Cheers,
>
> - Peter
>