Hi Dave, Bob,
This does not sound right to my ears.
It's like some Rectangles were outrepassing their responsibility.
Simple objects, simple responsibilities. Let's not bend this precious
principle to make bad code works.
Bending and twisting is easy. It's a good recipe for making a big ball of
knots. Undoing the knots once the system is blocked and a feature can't be
added without a long query or will break two other features if a
refactoring is necessary is far less easy. Who is going to undo the knots?

Le 19 févr. 2018 01:48, <commits at source.squeak.org> a écrit :

> David T. Lewis uploaded a new version of Morphic to project The Inbox:
> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Morphic-dtl.1397.mcz
>
> ==================== Summary ====================
>
> Name: Morphic-dtl.1397
> Author: dtl
> Time: 18 February 2018, 7:47:52.917246 pm
> UUID: e43a00c9-b146-4838-b631-d0210ddb934b
> Ancestors: Morphic-dtl.1396
>
> Implement Rectangle>>innerBounds to support morphic geometry calculations,
> e.g. for flap layout positioning. Allows flaps in a Worldlet to function
> properly.
>
> =============== Diff against Morphic-dtl.1396 ===============
>
> Item was added:
> + ----- Method: Rectangle>>innerBounds (in category '*Morphic') -----
> + innerBounds
> +       "Return the inner rectangle enclosed by the bounds of this
> rectangle or
> +       morph. A rectangle may represent an interior region of a morph."
> +
> +       ^ self
> + !
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20180219/6ef12173/attachment.html>