[squeak-dev] Fwd: Removing of Universe classes
Kjell Godo
squeaklist at gmail.com
Fri Jan 26 03:22:59 UTC 2018
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 08:11 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Marcel,
>
> On Jan 25, 2018, at 7:42 AM, Marcel Taeumel <marcel.taeumel at hpi.de> wrote:
>
> The ReleaseBuilder does not deal with the build number. We do need that
> offset in Squeak-Version to compute our build number.
>
>
> Then I suggest it contain a class called SqueakVersion whose class comment
> includes the gist of Levente's message and whose two method categories,
> class & instance side, are called 'read the class comment' ;-)
>
+++++++ 1
i think this comment idea is a good idea
and i will use it in future if i ever get to because
people not in the know would know then
but who cares about them
but how long would it take to put this Class in
but if there was no head scratching or head banging
would not people feel that something is missing ?
and say
TRA-DI-TION
and the weight of all the previous nothing pray
tell : no-leave the head scratching and banging in
or
i didn’t know you were going to chide me
now i definitely will not do anything you said
but i definitely will do this if i ever get to
because people not in the know will probably be me
in another day or two
according to me and that guy who made erLang
who made some forlorn plea for just such a mercy on a future he
who is destined to head banging
by today me
who doesn’t see
any need to avoid it
as he notes that other genius who made that one single comment
in all his years of lines of stuff and it was
“and now for the tricky part”
which leads me to i can’t make head or tail of this
TIME TO REWRITE THIS THE WHOLE THING the Whole thing has gone
un maintainable
in my day we rewrote the whole thing once a day
and you can’t just say well here you fix this
because you forgot that future me is not in the know
and un maintainable here we come when future me gets ahold of this one
maybe I’m just forgetful and it’s just me
i do not have a forum on my own stuff to remind me
at least not one i have access to please
please me the kgb
or one that is more than half a bit
no no no no no no no no no
no wait there were yes-es in the before time
nothing but yes-es now there is only no
and everything is spitted and shut
down to go time to scrape
down to hell down to the
chinese bedrock of
swiss cheese
that tells
just keep on scraping a gaping get a cheese cutter
rewrite the whole f thing
because the whole f thing has gone to the kells
and is spinning in infinity due tell coq
did you know that in SE Asia the bank robbers are in the banks
and so nobody has a bank account
and so nobody has a Visa card
and so google is quitting
man going to grab
their crotch
huh imagine that
;-)
>
> Best,
> Marcel
>
> Am 25.01.2018 15:57:31 schrieb Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>:
> Hi Chris,
>
> but Squeak-Version is itself empty and the version info in
> ReleaseBuilder would appear to have obsoleted it. Shouldn't we also remove
> Squeak-Version?
>
> _,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
>
> On Jan 24, 2018, at 12:58 PM, Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> This one
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu>
> Date: Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Removing of Universe classes
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <
> squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>
>
> This question comes up from time to time.
> There's an empty package named Squeak-Version in the image. When you
> unload a package, let's say Universes-mt.48, you add 49 (48 + 1) to the
> version number of Squeak-Version and save it as well to ensure that the
> global Squeak version number keeps increasing.
>
> Levente
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20180126/951e3cce/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|