Hi Eliot

Thanks for the note about the 64/bit Squeak of 2008 on page

    http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/708

I just deleted that reference to a 64 bit version no longer known. And
added 'historical'.

I think the most important new information is that OSProcess should be
loaded from Squeak map and just the head version.

Though the page  http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/708 still could need
some improvement it is no longer a disaster I assume and will do a
better job than it did last week ....


--Hannes

On 3/9/18, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 7:01 AM, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is fine, thank you.
>>
>> The info has been added to the  OSProcess
>> (http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/708) page.
>>
>
> This exemplifies the disaster that is our online documentation.  The page
> has version inf from 2008 and talks about a 64-bit Squeak which has nothing
> to do with our current release 64-bit Squeak.  It is hopelessly misleading
> to a newbie trying to navigate our documentation. :-(
>
>
>
>> HH
>>
>> On 3/8/18, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 12:23:58PM +0100, H. Hirzel wrote:
>> >> The page 'OSProcess' links to page 'CommandShell'
>> >>
>> >> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/1914
>> >>
>> >> Is the command shell included if I load OSProcess?
>> >>
>> >> Which version do I get
>> >>
>> >> --HH
>> >
>> > Use the latest version of OSProcess and CommandShell, and load both
>> > of them. You can also load both from SqueakMap. Please use the head
>> > (latest version) and ignore any Squeak version tags or warnings.
>> > OSProcess and CommandShell are version independent, but there is
>> > no way to say that with SqueakMap.
>> >
>> > Dave
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On 3/8/18, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hello
>> >> >
>> >> > Where is the home page of the OSProcess package?
>> >> >
>> >> > The following one
>> >> >
>> >> >     http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/708
>> >> >
>> >> > is easily found on the wiki but it was last updated in 2008. Does it
>> >> > still apply or is there a newer one?
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards
>> >> > Hannes
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> _,,,^..^,,,_
> best, Eliot
>