Hello

Following up on this thread.

Where do I get the latest version of the RefactoringTools updated for
the most recent trunk version?

There are some SqueakMap entries but they are outdated.

This

     http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/831

seems to give recent information as well.

--Hannes

On 11/3/17, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Jakob Reschke <forums.jakob at resfarm.de>
> wrote:
>
>> Am 02.11.2017 7:11 nachm. schrieb "Eliot Miranda"
>> <eliot.miranda at gmail.com
>> >:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:15 AM, Marcel Taeumel <marcel.taeumel at hpi.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Next step would be to build a preview tool that supports add/remove
>>> steps
>>> of a refactoring. For example, a "rename message" might tackle too much
>>> methods. That is, there is no scoping at the moment.
>>>
>>
>> OK.  We likely definitely want to scope by package(s), right?
>>
>>
>>
>> Unless you wanted to say "packages, not classes or categories" I do not
>> think so. Mostly because projects/software is often divided into -Core
>> and
>> -Tests packages. Or think of -Examples, -Plugins, -Extensions... So I
>> fear
>> explicit input of the scope (a set of packages) will be required.
>>
>
> I think offering two scopes is adequate:
> a) the entire system
> b) classes and extension methods whose package name matches either a prefix
> or a pattern
>
>
>
>> Using package dependencies (like in ENVY) would be nice, but they are
>> unmaintained in Monticello (often only supplied with Metacello).
>>
>> Oh, and my Environments bell is ringing again... ;-)
>>
>
> Remember that one can always generate more narrowly scoped refactoring by
> 1. performing the refactoring on some larger scope (e.g. the entire system)
> 2. quitting the system
> 3. using the changes crash recovery tool to select the desired refactorings
> or by using method versions to revert any unwanted
>
> So having a simple generally useful scope such as package or package prefix
> would work for me.
>
> _,,,^..^,,,_
> best, Eliot
>