Looks great, thank you!


Best,

Christoph

________________________________
Von: Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org> im Auftrag von Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Dezember 2019 23:12:33
An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] Monticello regression regarding modification detection?

There may be a better way to fix it, but this does work.

 - Chris

On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 11:56 AM Thiede, Christoph <Christoph.Thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de<mailto:Christoph.Thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de>> wrote:

Hi all,


as we are currently updating Squeak by Example<https://github.com/codeZeilen/SqueakByExample-english>, I came across the following section from the chapter Environment about Monticello:


To tell Monticello about your package, click on +Package, and type the name of the package, in his case "SBE". Monticello will add SBE to its list of packages; the package entry will be marked with an asterisk to show that the version in the image has not yet been written to any repository. [italic mine]

In context, a class under the system category "SBE" has been created before creating the package.

However, I cannot reproduce the described behavior in Trunk: I first need to raise another relevant SystemChangeNotifier event again before the asterisk appears. Just after creating the package, it is not displayed as modified.


Is this a regression in modern Monticello, or had the original SbE author dreamt a dream that has never become reality until today? :)


Best,

Christoph

Follow-up: thread on GitHub<https://github.com/codeZeilen/SqueakByExample-english/issues/21#issuecomment-562656260>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20191206/7cec00b5/attachment.html>