Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> schrieb am So., 29.
Dez. 2019, 19:26:

>
>
>
> However, concerning this change, it's better to think twice.
>

That's why it is here now. :-)

There are a lot of senders of doSilently: and I don't think that the
> intention was to not log into .changes
> Are we sure that we will not loose source code of installed stuff?
>

If there is a more appropriate way to mask changes loaded during tests, I
will be glad to use it.

Currently I sprinkle doSilently: all over those tests but the Monticello
loadings still get logged. I wish they were silent, but how to control this?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20191229/62b058b9/attachment.html>