[squeakdev] Logarithmic interval ?
karl ramberg
karlramberg at gmail.com
Sat Feb 9 16:04:54 UTC 2019
Hi,
Cool. I will try it soon. I have a cold at the moment :(
Cheers,
Karl
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:28 PM Nicolas Cellier <
nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
> And I have added a LogarithmicInterval which is more like numpy.logspace.
>
> For a LogarithmicInterval, bounds are specified by their logarithm (in
> whatever base).
>
> If you want 100 points from 0.1 to: 10.0, then you can write:
> (0.1 log logTo: 10 log size: 100 base: 10).
> or:
> (1 logTo: 1 size: 100 base: 10)
> or you can omit the base and use ln/exp
> (0.1 ln logTo: 10 ln size: 100).
>
> Le ven. 8 févr. 2019 à 15:56, Nicolas Cellier <
> nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> Hi Karl, I published GeometricInterval along with some
>> GeometricIntervalTests at
>>
>> MCHttpRepository
>> location: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/STEM'
>> user: ''
>> password: ''.
>>
>> It is a port of VW SYSEXTGeometricInterval from Cincom public store, a
>> bit revisited.
>>
>> Le dim. 3 févr. 2019 à 21:18, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> You are right.
>>> It would be nice to have a logarithmic interval.
>>>
>>> Best.
>>> Karl
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 6:37 PM Nicolas Cellier <
>>> nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi karl,
>>>> This is not a logarithmic interval. The progression should be
>>>> geometric, that is with a constant ratio.
>>>>
>>>> x3/x2 = (x2/x1).
>>>>
>>>> The ith element of geometric serie should be something like
>>>>
>>>> (ratio raisedTo: i1) * start.
>>>>
>>>> Le dim. 3 févr. 2019 à 18:15, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> I used a workaround that probably is more flexible since I have
>>>>> several variables that need the logarithm
>>>>>
>>>>> steps := 100.
>>>>> xLog := 0.02 log: steps.
>>>>> yLog := 1.894 log: steps
>>>>> 1 to: steps do:[:i
>>>>> x := i raisedTo: xLog.
>>>>> y := i raisedTo: yLog.
>>>>> ]
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Karl
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 5:10 PM Nicolas Cellier <
>>>>> nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes,
>>>>>> But i don't remember if published somewhere... I'll check this
>>>>>> evening or tomorrow
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le dim. 3 févr. 2019 à 16:43, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com> a
>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> Does anybody know of a logarithmic interval implementation in Squeak
>>>>>>> where the steps in the interval go by logarithmic scale instead of linear ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
 next part 
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeakdev/attachments/20190209/503cfc0f/attachment.html>
More information about the Squeakdev
mailing list
