[squeak-dev] The Inbox: Monticello-cmm.1550112371873461.mcz

Nicolas Cellier nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com
Sun Feb 24 20:23:55 UTC 2019


Thank you very much Bert!

Did you got it from the reading code, or from prior knowledge?
Or a mix of the two (prior knowledge that it never was a problem)?

One thing is sure, you did not learn this via class comments ;)

Le jeu. 21 févr. 2019 à 18:21, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Yes, this solution is amazingly simple. It is interesting that it can
> take a lot of discussion and analysis to find something like this!
>
> --Hannes
>
> On 2/20/19, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> For internal ancestral operations, it does, the names are needed to
> >>> know which files to access when, say, you request a diff operation.
> >>
> >> If I read the code correctly, then all we need to do is upload the
> second
> >> version of 'Monticello-bf.540' as 'Monticello-bf.540(1).mcz' to trunk.
> >> Then MC should find both files when looking up the ancestry, it should
> >> parse the actual version ID, and use the right one.
> >
> > Yo!  You're right!!
> >
> >       'Monticello-bf.540' asMCVersionName = 'Monticello-bf.540(1).mcz'
> > asMCVersionName   "true"
> >
> > Oh my, what a rabbit-hole of a discussion we had if, all along, all we
> > had to do was rename the file!  I'm glad we ultimately identified the
> > fix (which was right in front of us all along, lol!) and even more
> > delighted that we'll be able to make our repositories whole in spite
> > of existing duplicates!
> >
> > Thanks Bert and all!
> >
> >  - Chris
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20190224/592222d7/attachment.html>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list