On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:13 PM David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
>
> The test is not intended to advocate for or against caching #getSeconds.
> It provides coverage for expected behavior. So if you did decide to cache
> #getSeconds, then you would still want this test to pass.

I was referring to your your reference from the other thread:
____
"I also added a test (Chronology-Tests-dtl.15 in the inbox) that illustrates
the hazards of caching the getSeconds value."
____

...which easily reads as opposition to the idea of caching it.

Best,
  Chris