[squeak-dev] Shadowing "reserved" variables
wiljo at mac.com
Fri Jul 19 01:25:55 UTC 2019
It is by definition erroneous. It is counter to the definition of the standard language. That is a problem that should be fixed.
> On Jul 18, 2019, at 7:53 PM, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com <mailto:nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Is it really a problem?
> Did the system horribly break?
> IMO this should just be not recommended.
> Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 00:39, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com <mailto:asqueaker at gmail.com>> a écrit :
> Wow. We should disallow that. Those words are reserved.
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 5:52 AM Levente Uzonyi <leves at caesar.elte.hu <mailto:leves at caesar.elte.hu>> wrote:
> Hi All,
> You can currently evaluate the following:
> [ :self :thisContext |
> | nil super true false |
> nil := 1.
> super := 2.
> true := 3.
> false := 4.
> self + thisContext = (nil + super + true + false) ] value: 4 value: 6
> Is this the expected behavior or should we disallow such oddities?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Squeak-dev