Am So., 26. Mai 2019 um 20:56 Uhr schrieb Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com
>:

> Right.  Expected failures should be put into their own #test.. method
> and not mixed with assertions that are expected to pass.  Otherwise,
> the SUnit domain won't be able to properly express to you the state of
> those tests, as you said.
>

Makes sense. Hope everyone is aware of that for the future use of the
feature.

PS.

I came across an apparent "self
> contradiction" in the spec.
>

Whew I tried to read "self contradiction" as a Smalltalk expression at
first... :-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20190526/123ec55d/attachment.html>