[squeak-dev] CommandLineUIManager

Nicolas Cellier nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com
Sat Nov 9 21:30:30 UTC 2019


Ah, obviously, it's CommandLine thread...
So you use a regular windows VM when you want to switch to graphical I
presume...
I asked because i have tested launching xcfe in wsl directed to a windows X
server (VcXserv). It works, but lacks of stability...

Le sam. 9 nov. 2019 à 01:38, Thiede, Christoph <
Christoph.Thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> a écrit :

> > curious, which graphic environment? Xming or something?
>
> Windows Subsystem for Linux with a virtual Ubuntu - no graphical
> environment, shell only afaik :)
>
> ------------------------------
> *Von:* Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org> im
> Auftrag von Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com>
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 8. November 2019, 22:46
> *An:* The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> *Betreff:* Re: [squeak-dev] CommandLineUIManager
>
> Hi Christoph,
>
> Le ven. 8 nov. 2019 à 22:24, Thiede, Christoph <
> Christoph.Thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> a écrit :
>
>> @Chris:
>>
>>
>> > I believe it has nothing to do with my command.  Even if you try to
>> just run
>> >    squeak -version
>> > in that environment, I think you'll get the same error.
>>
>>
>> No, this one works:
>>
>>
>> 5.0-201810071412  Mon Oct  8 09:30:27 UTC 2018 gcc 4.8 [Production Spur
>> 64-bit VM]
>> CoInterpreter VMMaker.oscog-eem.2437 uuid:
>> 0e97c106-dd0b-437b-b1aa-e15257288c3f Oct  8 2018
>> StackToRegisterMappingCogit VMMaker.oscog-eem.2432 uuid:
>> 7b14d114-0e04-4e46-b8a7-4b5e6d87f5fe Oct  8 2018
>> VM: 201810071412 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git
>> ...
>>
>>
>> (Just wondering why the current Trunk image is delivered with a VM that
>> has version 5.0 ...)
>>
>> Creating the squeak.conf did not change the behavior for me.
>>
>> I am using a Ubuntu WSL.
>>
> curious, which graphic environment? Xming or something?
>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *Von:* Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org> im
>> Auftrag von David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com>
>> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 8. November 2019 14:34 Uhr
>> *An:* The general-purpose Squeak developers list
>> *Betreff:* Re: [squeak-dev] CommandLineUIManager
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 09:30:44PM -0800, tim Rowledge wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > > On 2019-11-06, at 7:43 PM, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > There are two flavors of the Linux VM, you're using the version of
>> the VM that's a little better, but requires you to install a file into your
>> security limits that allows it to work.
>> > >
>> > > Create a text file called "squeak.conf" with these contents (between
>> the horizontal lines):
>> > >
>> > > *       hard    rtprio  2
>> > > *       soft    rtprio  2
>> >
>> > The daft thing is that this problem was purportedly fixed in linux
>> kernels as of {mumble-mumble} years ago. Raspbian, for example, does not
>> need it and Raspbian is based on a very conservative branch of Debian
>> >
>>
>> Uhmm... it's not a "problem" that needs to be fixed. The Rasbian
>> distribution of Debian Linux is typically intended as single-user
>> system on which you can safely assume that if the user does something
>> dumb, then it serves him/her right when the system locks up.
>>
>> In the general case of a multi-user system, you don't want someone
>> to elevate their thread priorities and accidentally lock up the
>> entire system. That's why you are not allowed to use real time
>> scheduling priority in ordinary user applications.
>>
>> Some Linux distributions enforce this by default, and others do
>> not. I think that it more or less depends on the intended audience
>> for the distribution.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20191109/aaf3ceca/attachment.html>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list