Chris Muller-4 wrote
> I meant a single class which simply gave names to what you're using for
> #key and #value of your Associations.  But whether its one class for all
> types, or one class per type, or neither but just a good comment somewhere
> -- the goal is to help future readers unfamiliar with that spec structure
> understand it quickly.

Because of the polymorphy of the spec format (value is either symbol or
symbol-index-pair), I think we rather would need two classes at minimum. I
have always tried to minimize the number of classes, but if you suggest it,
I will give a try to extract such an InspectorFieldSpec class. :-)



--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Squeak-Dev-f45488.html