Hi Eliot,

Am Mi., 26. Aug. 2020 um 11:20 Uhr schrieb Eliot Miranda
<eliot.miranda at gmail.com>:
>
> If we go with Tonel then we must change it to support method timestamps.  I have a change set that does this (it is a trivial change).  And my changes are controlled by a class variable so that the same code can produce Pharo format or a slightly modified format that includes method timestamps.
>
> What I don’t understand is why Esteban Lorenzano refuses to accept my changes and allow Tonel to be used either with or without method timestamps.
>

Method timestamps produce merge conflicts inevitably. Can you re-post
your changeset here?
https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk/squeak-tonel/issues Then we could
discuss whether to include it at least in the Squeak version. As we
have heard from Mariano some time ago, VA Smalltalk also puts its
dialect-specific metadata in the Tonel format, so Squeak would not be
the first to do so.

Kind regards,
Jakob