Hmm.

MCRepositoryGroup
repositories
    ^{ MCCacheRepository default }, repositories select: [ :ea | ea isValid ]

includesVersionNamed: aString
    ^ repositories anySatisfy: [ : each | [each includesVersionNamed:
aString] on: Error do: [false]]

Am Mi., 17. Juni 2020 um 19:46 Uhr schrieb Marcel Taeumel
<marcel.taeumel at hpi.de>:
>
> The package cache is treated special anyway. I don't know what would happen if you would added it explicitely. Maybe you would also have to manually update it if the package-cache location changes?
>
> Best,
> marcel
>
> Am 17.06.2020 19:21:46 schrieb Jakob Reschke <forums.jakob at resfarm.de>:
>
> Why did the repositoryGroup not contain the package cache? the cache is displayed for all working copies as far as I know. Or is that just a hack of MCWorkingCopyBrowser as well...?
>
>
> <commits at source.squeak.org> schrieb am Di., 16. Juni 2020, 14:06:
>>
>> Marcel Taeumel uploaded a new version of Monticello to project The Trunk:
>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Monticello-mt.724.mcz
>>
>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>
>> Name: Monticello-mt.724
>> Author: mt
>> Time: 16 June 2020, 2:06:17.310762 pm
>> UUID: a6026367-76f2-d84d-9fd2-2a829c174d64
>> Ancestors: Monticello-mt.723
>>
>> Also check the package cache when looking for a new unique version name because that cache may hold local experiments.
>>
>> =============== Diff against Monticello-mt.723 ===============
>>
>> Item was changed:
>>   ----- Method: MCWorkingCopy>>uniqueVersionName (in category 'private') -----
>>   uniqueVersionName
>>         |versionName|
>>         counter := nil.
>>         [versionName := self nextVersionName.
>> +       (MCRepository packageCache includesVersionNamed: versionName)
>> +               or: [self repositoryGroup includesVersionNamed: versionName]] whileTrue.
>> -       self repositoryGroup includesVersionNamed: versionName] whileTrue.
>>         ^ versionName!
>>
>>
>