[squeak-dev] [ERROR}[5.3] building ByteArrays from HEX strings are now failing

Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda at gmail.com
Wed Mar 4 16:43:57 UTC 2020


Hi Rob,

> On Mar 4, 2020, at 7:57 AM, Robert via Squeak-dev <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Are there instructions for building Bochs, Nicolas?
> 

If you want to work on the cryptography plugins then as Nicolas suggests you can use the StackInterpreterSimulator.  You don’t need to use the JIT to work on a plugin, and the StackInterpreterSimulator is probably twice as fast as the JIT simulator (CogVMSimulator) since it isn’t simulating machine code, only interpreting bytecode.

> tyk, r
> 
>> On 3/4/20 10:50 AM, Robert wrote:
>> Hi yo hehr, Nicolas,
>> 
>> I tried the first block, in the simulation window, but it was missing BochsIA64 or some. I then ran the third block, a StackVM as you suggested. I ran it against my Cryptography repair image, rabbit, and very slooowly reselected the tests and ran them, in proogrress...
>> 
>> We sure would be appreciating etwas help, as if there was a little angel out there who offers plugin repair and SHA512 code/plugin. Praying for an angel! 
>> 
>> tyk, r
>> 
>> On 3/4/20 8:50 AM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
>>> Hi Robert,
>>> normally, most of VM/plugins development should take place with the VM-simulation from within the SpurVMMaker.image  (unless the plugin extensively call C functions from external libraries).
>>> You will find a Worksapce with some simulation examples.
>>> Then you might detect the error from within Smalltalk with debuggers etc...
>>> I recommend simulating a Stack VM for a beginning (or you'll need to compile the Bochs plugin, which is currently difficult on linux...).
>>> 
>>> Le mer. 4 mars 2020 à 14:40, Robert via Squeak-dev <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org> a écrit :
>>>> Hi Levente,
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, I see what you are saying. Without the Crypto plugins, all the Crypto tests run green. 
>>>> 
>>>> With the Crypto plugins, things get messed up. ByteArray class>>#fromHexString: still completes, but the KeyHolder>>#key SEG-FAULTS the vm (called from CryptoRC2Test>>#testARC2). Additionally, the following two tests fail: CryptoDESTest>>#testDESCBC and CryptoDESTest>>#testTripleDESCBC. 
>>>> 
>>>> The SEG-FAULT comes from this code:
>>>> 
>>>> KeyHolder new
>>>>     data: KeyHolderData new;
>>>>     encryptKey: #(0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) asByteArray;
>>>>     key
>>>> 
>>>> tyk, r
>>>> 
>>>>> On 3/4/20 8:10 AM, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>>>>> Hi Robert,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I just ran all test cases of Cryptography-v5.3-rww.118.mcz in a fresh 5.3
>>>>> image on 64-bit linux using the stock VM (no Cryptography plugins), and
>>>>> all the tests are green.
>>>>> ByteArray class >> #fromHexString: and methods sent by it were last
>>>>> modified in 2010, and they do not accept non-hexadecimal digits in the
>>>>> input string.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Levente
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020, Robert via Squeak-dev wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> In squeak 5.3, building ByteArrays from HEX strings are now failing,
>>>>>> after years of passing within the Cryptography tests.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The first doIt works, while the other two are now failing in the
>>>>>> #readHexFrom: method...
>>>>>> PASSING
>>>>>> ByteArray fromHexString: '06a9214036b8a15b512e03d534120006'
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> FAILING
>>>>>> ByteArray fromHexString: '16rc286696d887c9aa0611bbb3e2025a45a'
>>>>>> ByteArray fromHexString: '00000000 00000000'
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is causing multiple test failures in the Cryptography test suite.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> tyk, r
>>>> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20200304/8101f667/attachment.html>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list