[squeak-dev] The Inbox: EToys-kfr.412.mcz
Christoph.Thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de
Mon Nov 2 17:07:01 UTC 2020
Hi Karl, hi Marcel,
thanks for caring. Can we backport this change to at least Squeak 5.3? I'm sure the users will love to know what their buttons do in older versions, too. In other words, I'd consider the current appearance in Squeak 5.3 a bug ...
This should be quite easy by writing an adequate postscript, shouldn't it?
Von: Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org> im Auftrag von Taeumel, Marcel
Gesendet: Montag, 2. November 2020 17:05:21
Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] The Inbox: EToys-kfr.412.mcz
done and already merged into Trunk. Next build artifacts on files.squeak.org will have those icons loaded.
Am 30.10.2020 19:18:01 schrieb karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com>:
It loads these just the most used forms and so it should be fine for standard image.
It makes etoys and BookMorph look ok.
It should be called from ReleaseBuilder. But I'm not sure where to trigger the loading.
Here are a list of the forms:
"RoundGoldBox, TryItPressed, TryIt, MenuIcon, AddCategoryViewer, AddInstanceVariable, TanOPressed, TanO, Gets, RightCaret, DownCaret, NextPage, NextPagePressed, PrevPage, PrevPagePressed"
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 7:13 PM karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com<mailto:karlramberg at gmail.com>> wrote:
I made a method that load the most essential Etoy Icons so Etoys look ok even in standard Squeak.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 7:07 PM Marcel Taeumel <marcel.taeumel at hpi.de<mailto:marcel.taeumel at hpi.de>> wrote:
> I'm not sure where in ReleaseBuilder to hook up the initialization of the Etoy icons. Any suggestions?
You mean after or even before calling "ReleaseBuilderSqueakland setEtoysMode"?
Am 30.10.2020 19:04:25 schrieb karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com<mailto:karlramberg at gmail.com>>:
I'll revise the other changes once I have time.
I'm not sure where in ReleaseBuilder to hook up the initialization of the Etoy icons. Any suggestions?
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 5:06 PM Marcel Taeumel <marcel.taeumel at hpi.de<mailto:marcel.taeumel at hpi.de>> wrote:
> Removed from inbox now
Just meant that for contributions to come. ^.^' Sorry for the mix up.
Would you re-upload the contents from:
(I managed to merge Etoys-kfr.377 up to 380 from my local package-cache.)
Am 21.10.2020 20:30:28 schrieb karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com<mailto:karlramberg at gmail.com>>:
Removed from inbox now
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 6:12 PM Marcel Taeumel <marcel.taeumel at hpi.de<mailto:marcel.taeumel at hpi.de>> wrote:
please do not chain unprocessed inbox items in the ancestry. This way, we can never copy over your versions but always have to re-commit your changes method-by-method. Instead, base your changes on the most recent Trunk version.
EToys-kfr.413 (inbox) needs kfr.412 (inbox) but is unrelated
EToys-kfr.412 (inbox) needs kfr.392 (inbox) and eem.411 (trunk)
EToys-kfr.392 (inbox) needs kfr.378 (inbox) and mt.391 (trunk)
Yes, we will see to merge your EToys contributions ASAP. Thanks! ^__^
Am 17.10.2020 20:03:09 schrieb tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org<mailto:tim at rowledge.org>>:
> On 2020-10-17, at 9:03 AM, commits at source.squeak.org<mailto:commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:
> self world can return nil
That is somehow both deeply philosophical and sad
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org<mailto:tim at rowledge.org>; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Useful random insult:- Settled some during shipping and handling.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Squeak-dev