> On 2021-03-15, at 10:30 AM, Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> https://twitter.com/jamescham/status/1370955307799613441?s=20
> 
> I retweeted it. A friend of mine responded thus:
> 
> «
> Ludicrous price, image based persistence making software distribution
> a nightmare, trivial 'image wide' malware, and the inability to run
> anything not written in smalltalk. And 'No'.
> »
> 
> The price is now moot since there are multiple FOSS implementations,
> but a couple of the other points seem quite telling... or do they?

Nope. They're utterly wrong in a wrongness level rarely achieved.

tim
--
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
A bug in the code is worth two in the documentation.